At Monday's "After Virginia Votes" event at GMU in Arlington, one of the topics for discussion was - not suprisingly, given its central role in the 2015 elections - the Dan Gecker vs. Glen Sturtevant race in the 10th State Senate district (Richmond City, Chesterfield and Powhatan Counties).
I wrote about this race last Saturday in Could Strong Progressive Emily Francis Have Won the 10th District...and Democratic Control of the Virginia State Senate? In that piece, I reported on what I found in crunching the numbers:
- Dan Gecker’s performance in Richmond City was almost identical to the performance of 2011 Democratic nominee David Bernard -- who ran on a strong environmental and progressive platform - in Richmond City (67% support for Bernard, 68% for Gecker).
- This is even more amazing when you consider that 2011 Democratic nominee David Bernard received essentially ZERO financial support against an entrenched incumbent, unlike this year's open-seat race, in which Dan Gecker was lavished with millions of dollars from the party, Michael Bloomberg, etc. Despite all that money, and the fact that he wasn't running against an entrenched incumbent, Gecker only managed to win essentially the same vote share as the unfunded progressive Bernard in "blue" Richmond City. Lame.
- What was needed fro Democrats to win this election, clearly, was much larger voter turnout in Richmond for the Democratic nominee from the Democratic "base." Instead, we saw Richmond's proportion of the vote increase by a measly 1 percentage point from 2011 to 2015. Meh.
- Richmond City saw a 34 percentage-point decline (at most) from 2013 ("at most" because of split precincts, which make it hard to compare the gubernatorial election to the State Senate election), while Chesterfield saw a 19 percentage-point decline in turnout from 2013.
So, given that I'm stumped, I asked a leading Richmond-area Democratic politico what they thought of Zuzenak's analysis. Here's their (slightly edited) reply:
I completely disagree with the "back-patting" on the Richmond turnout increase. Yes it was up from 2011. OF COURSE the percent turnout was up from 2011. 2011 was not a seriously contested race! People who voted in 2011, voted to make a statement against John Watkins or out of pure civic duty...knowing exactly who was going to win that race. That is a very different dynamic than actually have a contested race in an open seat.
Clearly, the better comparison is with 2013 -- look at the percentage drop off. The bottom line is that Democrats did NOT turn out in this election in the numbers needed. To an exztent, of course, this is an institutional/systematic issue (e.g., more voter registration, stronger committee work, neighborhood organizing), but it's also a candidate issue, in that Richmond residents need to be motivated by the Democratic candidate to mobilize. The flip side is that Republicans (right now) are just better, more regular voters than we are. We need to change that.Bottom line: Democrats failed this cycle in SD-10 to excite our base, including in Richmond, and that was Dan Gecker's undoing. And no amount of spin by smooth political operatives can change that fundamental fact.