Not only is no government agency or entity required to meet such draconian requirements. No private company is, either. So, the questions I have are these: Who thought up this idea that is guaranteed to bankrupt the Postal Service? Why and how was this law passed? The answers are pretty bad. |
Elaine in Roanoke :: Goodlatte, Griffith, Hurt: Do Something! |
The sponsor of the 2006 PAEA was former GOP Rep. Tom Davis of Virginia. The bill had been brought up before, but earlier versions didn't have specific numbers or deadlines attached. Davis' bill put numbers that obviously couldn't be met into the legislation. The way the bill became law is really very shady. Late one evening, the Republican-controlled House brought up the bill. It was passed by voice vote, and when one congressman asked for a recorded vote, his motion was ruled out of order. So, no one had to go on record as voting for the bill's passage.The Senate vote was no better. It passed there by unanimous consent, meaning no recorded vote was taken. Even though the Democrats had 45 votes, they didn't filibuster in order to refuse passage. Nor did minority leader Harry Reid, who was present, object to the bill. Now, I know there are many Republicans who want to destroy the Postal Service through "privatization," but the quiet collusion of Democrats must have meant there was more to this bill than meets the eye. Perhaps the Democrats were so clueless that they thought a vote for PAEA was a way to protect workers' future pensions. Perhaps some in Congress foresaw that the old post office model was unworkable because of the Internet and threw up their hands, rather than trying to find a solution to save a government service as old as the nation itself. Or, did people in Congress just lust after all that post office property that would come available as offices closed all over the country? Whatever the reasoning, if Goodlatte, Griffith, and Hurt want to change things, then they should propose legislation to end the nonsensical money drain on the Postal Service. Or, better yet, they could support the legislative ideas suggested by Mary Landrieu, Democrat of Louisiana. She has proposed giving the post office new sources of revenue by having them provide various additional services for citizens, such having notary publics, handing out hunting and fishing licenses, providing fax services, etc. Just whining because legislation their own party came up with is killing jobs and weakening vital services to their voters isn't solving the problem. My message to Goodlatte and gang is simple. Do something to fix this mess! Don't just talk about how terrible it is. Congress caused the problem, so do something! Oh, right, joining with Landrieu would mean compromising with a Democrat. Never mind... |
Goodlatte, Griffith, Hurt: Do Something!
Sunday, August 3, 2014
by Elaine in Roanoke