Pages

Advertising

Virginia Del.-Elect Mark Levine: Allowing Oregon "Terrorists" to Win Would "end the rule of law in our Republic"

Monday, January 4, 2016

Virginia Delegate-elect Mark Levine (D-Alexandria, Arlington) just posted the following on his Facebook page about the Washington Post article, Armed activists in Oregon touch off unpredictable chapter in land-use feud. I couldn't agree more with what Mark Levine has to say here. I'd just add that if this were a bunch of heavily-armed African American or Muslim men taking over a federal building, they'd probably be dead by now; the right wing would be going nuts; the media would be in overdrive calling them "terrorists;" etc. Yet in this case, 2016 Republican presidential candidates are silent, Fox et al are calling these people "protestors," etc. A wild, stark, highly-revealing contrast. And yeah, anyone who doesn't understand that is utterly (and/or willfully) oblivious to the way things actually work in this country.
And this is why those people who make claims that we all have "an individual right under the Second Amendment to own guns outside a well regulated militia" for the ridiculous reason that we must defend against a Hitlerian Federal Government that would "snatch our guns away" are playing with fire. Their horrific rhetoric encourages American terrorists to attack.

And no, their guns will not defeat the People of the United States or its duly elected Federal Government. We should cordon off the area, put these terrorists under siege, and allow no food or people in (unless they have hostages, in which case we have trained people to deal with this). We should allow them all to come out, with their hands up. And then arrest each and every one of them and treat them no differently than we would if armed ISIS terrorists had occupied a US Federal Building.

If they are holding people there against their will or fire at our officers, prepare the best snipers we have. Seal Team Six, if necessary. If not, we can be patient, but our tanks -- and their hunger -- will eventually defeat their guns. These terrorists will not do to us what Russia did to Ukraine.

This is not a peaceful protest. This is not a sit in. This is not the equivalent of the Occupy Movement (people who were never armed and never resisted arrest).

This is people defying the will of a democratically elected Government and seeking to overthrow it. There is one and only one way to overthrow the Government of the United States: free and fair elections.

This is consistent with the vision of our Founders. Recall that President George Washington personally put down the armed Whiskey Rebellion when a group of armed farmers sought to defy a duly enacted tax. It's also why President Washington would have NEVER agreed that individuals have a right to bear arms in order to challenge their duly-elected government with force of arms. The Second Amendment is supposed to allow you to serve your duly-elected government in a well regulated militia, not to allow you to oppose your duly-elected government with an armed insurrection.

President Lincoln was right about this too. Recall that the largest armed insurrection against the Federal Government in American history was brutally put down. Hundreds of thousands of Americans died in the U.S. Civil War. And yes, it was the right thing to do. The Union was right.

These terrorists will not win. They cannot win. They cannot be allowed to win. To allow them to win is to end the rule of law in our Republic.

Monday News: "Why aren't we calling the Oregon occupiers 'terrorists?'"; GOP 2016 Candidates Stay Quiet on Oregon Standoff

by Lowell

Here are a few national and Virginia news headlines, political and otherwise, for Monday, January 4.


DNC, DPVA Steering Committee Member Frank Leone Demolishes "GOP Loyalty Oath Myths"

Sunday, January 3, 2016

by Lowell

Great job by Democratic National Committee (DNC) member and Democratic Party of Virginia (DPVA) Steering Committee member Frank Leone in demolishing a bunch of "myths" surrounding the Virginia GOP's "loyalty oath" for the March 1 presidential primary.  Key points, with a bit of my commentary mixed in.

1. Despite the media's relentless, dishonest attempts at creating a false equivalency between the Democratic and Republican parties, Leone explains that in fact both parties do NOT do "loyalty" oaths for Virginia presidential primaries. In fact:
...Since Va. Code 24.2-545 was adopted in 1999, parties may require voters to sign a statement of affiliation to participate in the state-administered presidential primary. Republicans required a statement in 2000, asked for a statement in 2008 and 2012, but withdrew their requests when outrage ensued, and have required a statement for 2016. Virginia Democrats have never required an oath to participate in their Presidential primary. Ever.
2. As I've pointed out as well, it's a very different thing for parties to require loyalty "pledges" or "oaths" in party-run, party-paid-for, low-turnout caucuses and conventions. A primary, in contrast, is run and paid for by the state. Also important to note is that the Virginia General Assembly, in its infinite wisdom (heh), has not passed legislation to require registration by party in Virginia. In other words, if Republicans are so worried about Democrats crossing over and messing with their preeeeeccciousssss primaries, then why don't they pass a law requiring party registration? Uhhhh.

3. This Republican "loyalty oath" fiasco is 100% the Virginia Republicans' doing -- Democrats had nothing to do with it. Nor, I'd add, did this blog, which the Virginia GOP's Executive Director bizarrely attempted to argue the other day.

4. Frank Leone's final point is an important one, and worth reprinting in full.

Sunday News: Jeff Schapiro's "New Year's wish list for Va. politicos" Includes VP Tim Kaine

by Lowell

Here are a few national and Virginia news headlines, political and otherwise, for Sunday, January 3.

Video: Phyllis Randall (D) Sworn in as New Loudoun County Board Chair

Saturday, January 2, 2016

Congratulations to Democrat Phyllis Randall for making history in Loudoun County, Virginia (see the video of her being sworn in as new Loudoun County Board Chair)! Also, congratulations to Democrat Koran Saines, who unseated raving homophobe and all-around extremist Eugene Delgaudio (R) and Kristen Umstattd (D) for the seat formerly held by Kenneth Reid (R). These three new members will definitely move the 9-member Loudoun County Board of Supervisors in a better direction; I just wish Democrats could have won two close races -- in Ashburn and Algonkian districts - and gotten closer (or over the hump) to taking back control of the Board. Still, this is a start, and something to build on for elections in four years...

 

An End to Veteran Homelessness in Virginia?

by Dan Sullivan

 photo Obama20serving20homeless20vets_zpsbhe3qamx.jpgThe good news first: our Governor set yesterday as the goal for ending veteran homelessness in Virginia; he declared a “functional end” in November. The bad news: that’s a fairly meaningless accomplishment. There is much to applaud in the administration’s efforts to help veterans in Virginia. Not this.

Loosely, the federal definition of a functional end to veteran homelessness is that there are no homeless veterans except those who have been offered housing and turned it down. It can also mean that the number of veterans becoming homeless is less than or equal to the number who are leaving homelessness. So by definition veterans will remain homeless. But accepting that as reality, the concept was originally operationalized in local jurisdictions where the challenge can be reasonably addressed; communities where the task of identifying homeless veterans and providing accommodations is manageable and meaningful. Finding a homeless veteran in a community and locating nearby housing is different than saying we have more available housing than we have identified homeless veterans statewide; particularly in a state as large as Virginia. It doesn’t matter to a homeless veteran in Winchester that there is a roof available in Norfolk.

Saturday News: Terrorists Use Trump in Recruiting Video; Gov. McAuliffe Heading to Cuba

by Lowell

Here are a few national and Virginia news headlines, political and otherwise, for Saturday, January 2.

If Fred Hiatt's Going to Fire Harold Meyerson Due to Insufficient "Clicks," Maybe Time to Fire Fred Hiatt, Jackson Diehl, Jennifer Rubin, etc.

Friday, January 1, 2016

Getting ready for New Year's Eve and generally not paying close attention to the news during the holiday season, a lot of people probably missed this item yesterday.
Journalists, liberals and many in the political and labor worlds — including presidential candidate Sen. Bernie Sanders — expressed regret on Thursday over the ending of Harold Meyerson's weekly column in the Washington Post.

"There are few progressive voices in corporate media. @HaroldMeyerson is one of the best. His insights will be sorely missed by Post readers," Sanders tweeted on Thursday.

[...]
...for the Post, ending Meyerson's columns wasn't about ideology or policies. It was about readership.

"The Post opinion section takes pride in publishing a wide range of views, including progressives Eugene Robinson, EJ Dionne, Ruth Marcus, Greg Sargent, Paul Waldman and Katrina vanden Heuvel and contributing columnists Rachel Maddow and Danielle Allen. We’ve been pleased to publish Harold’s columns for the past 13 years, but he failed to attract readers as these others have. And while our decision should never be made based only on clicks, I think it would be arrogant to entirely ignore what our readers are telling us" editorial page editor Fred Hiatt said in a statement to POLITICO.

So...Washington Post Editorial Page Editor Fred Hiatt's explanation for why Meyerson was fired was due to supposedly Meyerson's supposed "fail[ure] to attract readers." Is that true?  I decided to take a look. The problem, of course, is that I don't have access to the Post's readership data. So, I decided to use a very rough proxy: the number of comments each columnist attracted, on average, over their last 10 posts, and rank them that way (see graph, above; click to "embiggen"). As you can see,  Dionne, Robinson and Marcus averaged more comments than Meyerson. But many others -- Jared Bernstein, Stephen Stromberg, Jennifer Rubin, Charles Lane, Jackson Diehl, Robert Samuelson, Catherine Rampell, Anne Applebaum, Fred Hiatt himself, and Michael Gerson  -- all averaged fewer (in several cases FAR fewer) comments as Harold Meyerson, who ranks approximately in the middle of the Post editorial page writers I looked at.

Bottom line: if comments are even close to a proxy for comparative traffic within the Washington (Com)Post family, then Hiatt appears to have fired Meyerson for reasons other than "clicks." And if Hiatt really IS firing people based on their relative paucity of clicks (as opposed to, let's say, their quality, value, news-worthiness, insight, etc), then he should have started by firing himself.

Video: Newly-Elected Arlington County Board Members, Katie Cristol and Christian Dorsey, Lay Out Priorities for 2016

The Arlington County Board held its traditional New Year's Day morning organizational meeting today. Here's some video and a few highlights.

Newly-elected Board member Katie Cristol (D) joined others in first expressing thanks to outgoing Board Chair Mary Hynes (D) and outgoing Vice Chair Walter Tejada (D). She said that 2016 will "certainly be a year of change for the Arlington County Board," but when it comes to policy priorities, "follow-through is the new innovation." According to Cristol, "land use remains our greatest challenge." Cristol also talked about increasing the "availability of entry-level, affordable ownership housing and child care, which I believe are two of the utmost priorities for this board in the next few years." Cristol emphasized that "we MUST follow through on a comprehensive transit plan for Columbia Pike this year; residents and business owners have waited too long for what's next for this corridor...2016 has to be the year in which we get specific about what state-of-the-art bus service on Columbia Pike means." Finally, Cristol talked about "maintain[ing] our moral center by taking care of our most vulnerable."

For his part, newly-elected Board member Christian Dorsey (D) talked about his vision of "sustainable growth," namely "how we meet our present needs and overcome our current challenges without compromising the ability of current residents and future residents to enjoy our great community; how we take care of our present needs without kicking the consequences down the road, that must be borne in a most expensive and inefficient way by later boards and later residents in the community." Dorsey emphasized the "urgency toward our presenting and implementing a transit plan for Columbia Pike...This is an absolute prerequisite for sustainable growth." Dorsey said he's looking mostly to produce "singles and doubles," but wants to "swing for the fences" in "how we engage with the Arlington community...restore the faith that public participation is valued and valuable."

P.S. Also see remarks by new Vice Chair Jay Fisette (D) and new Chair Libby Garvey (D) on the "flip."

New Years Day 2016 News: President Obama on the "Epidemic of Gun Violence" and What We Need to Do About It

by Lowell

Here are a few national and Virginia news headlines, political and otherwise, for Friday, New Years Day 2016.